|
Who's Online? |
There are currently, 29 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here |
|
|
Quotable Quotes™ |
"In addition, real life needs an undo button, and, occasionally, a stop button when you're trying to rationalize with a female.
" --CodeNinja |
|
|
|
Judge: File-Swapping Tools Are Legal; |
Posted on Saturday, April 26 @ 01:11:47 BST by just_dave
|
By John Borland
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
April 25, 2003, 12:46 PM PT
In an almost complete reversal of previous victories for the record labels and movie studios, federal court Judge Stephen Wilson ruled that Streamcast--parent of the Morpheus software--and Grokster were not liable for copyright infringements that took place using their software. The ruling does not directly affect Kazaa, software distributed by Sharman Networks, which has also been targeted by the entertainment industry.
"Defendants distribute and support software, the users of which can and do choose to employ it for both lawful and unlawful ends," Wilson wrote in his opinion, released Friday. "Grokster and StreamCast are not significantly different from companies that sell home video recorders or copy machines, both of which can be and are used to infringe copyrights."
The ruling is the second major setback to date to the entertainment industry's efforts to keep a tight rein on online file-swapping, following a similiar decision in the Netherlands last year that found that Kazaa was not liable for its users' copyright infringements. If upheld, the decision could lead artists, record labels and movie studios to cast new legal strategies that they have until now been reluctant to try, including bringing lawsuits against individuals who copy unauthorized works over Napster-like networks.
More inside.
According to the major record labels, file-swapping is a major contributor to declines in music sales over the past few years, a trend that has thrown the industry into disarray. Debt-ridden media conglomerates are now considering sales of their music divisions even as they begin to test paid online music services intended to compete with free file-swapping networks and turn the tide.
Attorneys called the ruling a blow for entertainment and record companies trying to stop the networks used to swap unauthorized copies of their works.
"This is a very serious setback for the record industry and other content industries, because they've uniformly won these cases in the U.S.," Mark Radcliffe, an intellectual property attorney at Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich said.
While the ruling in no way validates the legality of downloading copyrighted music online, it would shield companies providing decentralized file-swapping software such as Gnutella from liability for the actions of people using their products.
As such, it could provide new leverage for file-swapping companies such as Grokster, Streamcast and Sharman in negotiations with record companies and other copyright holders to license works legitimately. Since Napster's $1 billion settlement offer with the record industry in 2001, file-swapping companies have repeatedly sought an amicable settlement with copyright holders but have been almost universally rebuffed.
The court's ruling applies only to existing versions of the Morpheus and Grokster software. Earlier versions of the software, which functioned slightly differently, could potentially leave the companies open to liability.
A spokeswoman for the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) said the copyright holders were deeply disappointed in the decision and would certainly appeal.
"We feel strongly that those who encourage, facilitate and profit from piracy should be held accountable for actions," MPAA spokeswoman Marta Grutka said. "We're hoping that people aren't taking this as an invitation to continue along the path of what is clearly illegal activity."
Recording industry officials said they saw some good in the ruling, but that they too would immediately appeal to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
"We are pleased with the Court's affirmation that individual users are accountable for illegally uploading and downloading copyrighted works off of publicly accessible peer-to-peer networks," said Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) chief executive officer Hilary Rosen in a statement. "(But) businesses that intentionally facilitate massive piracy should not be able to evade responsibility for their actions."
Wilson's decision comes in the most closely watched Net copyright case since Napster's demise.
The two pieces of file-swapping software affected by Friday's ruling remain among the most popular downloads on the Net, although they operate deep in the shadow of market leader Kazaa. Morpheus--once the undisputed leader--has fallen to about 120,000 downloads per week, according to Download.com, a software aggregation site operated by News.com publisher CNET Networks. Kazaa, by contrast, was downloaded more than 2.7 million times during the past week.
The RIAA and the MPAA sued Streamcast, Grokster, and the original parent company of Kazaa's software in October 2001, and the case has been making its way slowly through court since that time.
In late 2002, both sides asked the judge for summary judgment, or a quick ruling in their favor before going to a full trial. Wilson's decision in favor of the file-swapping companies Friday was tied to that months-old series of requests.
The decision does not directly affect Kazaa, at least not immediately. At the time that Grokster and Streamcast were arguing for summary judgment, Wilson had not yet ruled that the Australia-based Sharman Networks could be sued in the United States.
Sharman is scheduled to meet with RIAA and MPAA attorneys in court on Monday, to argue over whether its counterclaim against the record labels and movie studios should be dismissed. Friday's ruling, however, could change the direction of that hearing.
The judge's surprise ruling marked the first validation of an argument that file-swapping supporters have been making since Napster's first controversial arrival. Peer-to-peer file-trading is a technology that can be used for activities well beyond copyright infringement, and the technology should not be blocked altogether to stop solely its illegal uses, these backers have said.
In making that argument, the judge looked back to the landmark 1984 Supreme Court ruling that upheld the legality of Sony's Betamax videocassette recorder (VCR). That decision helped establish the doctrine of "substantial noninfringing use," which protects technology providers that distribute products--like the VCR or photocopier--that can be used for both legal and illegal purposes.
"We are absolutely very proud of this judge for having the unusual capacity to be able to grasp the technology and its future benefit to taxpayers and shareholders around the world," said Wayne Rosso, president of Grokster. "Technology is usually way ahead of courts and legislature. The fact that judge was able to acutely comprehend (this technology) is a credit to the legal system."
Not like Napster
Much of Wilson's ruling hung on the technological differences between Napster and the newer, decentralized file-swapping services.
Napster's service opened itself to liability for its users' actions by actively playing a role in connecting people who were downloading and uploading songs--a little like a physical swap meet provides the facilities for people exchanging illegal material, the judge said. By contrast, Grokster and Streamcast distributed software to people and had no control over what their users did afterwards, Wilson said.
When users search for and initiate transfers of files using the Grokster client, they do so without any information being transmitted to or through any computers owned or controlled by Grokster," Wilson wrote. "Neither Grokster nor StreamCast provides the site and facilities" for direct infringement. "If either defendant closed their doors and deactivated all computers within their control, users of their products could continue sharing files with little or no interruption."
It didn't matter that the companies were aware generally of copyright infringement happening using their software, Wilson added--they would have to know of specific instances of infringement and be able to do something about it, to be liable for those users' actions.
That stands in stark contrast to an earlier ruling against file-swapping company Aimster, in which the judge explicitly said the file-trading company did not need to know about individual acts of copyright infringement as they were happening to be held liable for the illegal activity.
Friday's decision is likely to send shock waves throughout the copyright and technology communities, which have adjusted slowly over the last year to the notion that file-trading services such as these were mostly likely illegal. Technology companies have complained that the repeated lawsuits have stifled innovation, but many also have begun to move forward in alliances with authorized music--and film-distribution services.
The case will certainly be appealed. Because different courts have come to very different conclusions about the law, the issue could go as high as the U.S. Supreme Court, a process that would likely take years.
"This is far from over," said Fred von Lohmann, an Electronic Frontier Foundation attorney who has represented Streamcast in the case. "This is not the end, but it sends a very strong message to the technology community that the court understands the risk to innovation."
In the interim, the ruling is likely to produce another round of interest in legislation affecting copyright issue on the Net--an outcome that Wilson himself foresaw.
Policy, "as well as history, supports our consistent deference to Congress when major technological innovations alter the market for copyrighted materials," Wilson wrote. "Congress has the constitutional authority and the institutional ability to accommodate fully the raised permutations of competing interests that are inevitably implicated by such new technology...Additional legislative guidance may be well-counseled."
Note: ut that would've taken up the entire front page if I hadn't parted it... good job though!
|
|
| |
| |
|
Article Rating |
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0
|
|
|
| "Login" | Login/Create an Account | 8 comments |
|
| | The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
|
|
tuener (Score: 1)
by vacheron on Wednesday, October 13 @ 08:56:36 BST
(User Info | Send a Message) | | the past most enamel jewelry wholesale rolex watches and with the watch is rare Now an international brand watches in addition to widespread use of a large number of red gold platinum fake watches multi-alloy but also extensive use of enamel material Application of enamel material not only watch the value of their rating with a qualitative leap but also to shape the face and dial watches are a new interpretation of meaning New rolex watch this show to continue to shape design popular in the large size breitling all the latest styles are popular watches that year will ultimately have a large size models tissot watches and were placed in a very significant important position Compared with the buy rolex |
[ No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register ]
[ No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register ]
[ No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register ]
Nathaniel (Score: 1)
by vacheron on Monday, November 01 @ 20:10:45 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) | | Cockpit watches sel Switzerland The winner shown here is beautiful but perhaps a bit of German bias My pick would be Vacheron's Tour d'I'lle which comes in at a humble number seven watches For men Lange Shnes Lange Time Zone Chronoswisss Digiteur vacheron constantin watch Glasshutte Originals tag wristwatches Panomatic Tourbillion Rolexs Prince Breitling for Bentleys Mulliner Tourbillon Omegas Seamaster Planet Ocean Co axial Vacheron Constatins Tour de IIle IWCs Ingenieur Automatic Longines Master Collection Chronograph Breguets La Tradition rolex jubilee dateJust ladies |
[ No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register ]
[ No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register ]
[ No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register ]
[ No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register ]
Re: Judge: File-Swapping Tools Are Legal; (Score: 1)
by tina on Thursday, September 22 @ 04:40:04 BST
(User Info | Send a Message) | There are so many different kinds of bags in Longchamp. Longchamp bags - The women's fashion bags on longchamp outlet. This is where to look for your style, and spread one's individuality. In particular,Longchamp le pliage is very popular with yong ladies. It is designed by Mario Sorrenti. If you want to own unqie one, please contact us. Thanks!
|
[ No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register ]
|
